Posts Tagged debating
Thanks to everyone who suggested songs on Twitter for my Champions Megamix CD, which played on the way to the Senior Debating State Final last Friday. In case you were wondering, here were the tracks I went with, in order of play:
- Eye of the tiger – Survivor
- We are the champions – Queen
- O Fortuna
- Without me – Eminem
- With a little help from my friends – The Beatles
- Hold on – Wilson Phillips
- Long way to the top – AC/DC
- Playing to win – Little River Band/John Farnham
- All fired up – Pat Benatar
- Simply the best – Tina Turner
- Champion – Kanye West
- Stronger – Kanye West
- We are family – Sidter Sledge
- The way we get by – Spoon
- Today – Smashing Pumpkins
It’s a killer playlist! Put this on and you will be able to take on the world! I made copies for the students to listen to while they study for HSC Trials :P
What would you put on your ultimate champions playlist? What is your ‘eye of the tiger’?
I was so proud on Friday to take my AWESOME Senior Debating team to the State Final.
Our team valiantly argued the Negative side of the topic That we should publish school league tables. It was a close debate, and we had a lot of support from the crowd! Ultimately the other team won the debate and the Hume-Barbour trophy, but as finalists our team won the English Speaking Union prize, and are now also eligible for the Elite Athletes and Performers Scheme at the University of Sydney (something we did not know, weren’t expecting, and were thrilled to hear!)
One of my students gave the most moving thank you speech at the end of the debate I have ever heard…she said really nice things about me as their coach and we all started to cry! Can’t believe another group of Year 12’s are almost leaving. I have had so much fun coaching this team :)
Once again it is that time of year when school debating teams start to pass the zone level and compete for Regional and State titles. This also makes it the time of year when debating coaches like myself need all the support from staff they can get, but unfortunately seem to have used up all their favours just getting the zone rounds done.
I think that debating is such a worthwhile activity for students to be involved in – both competitively, and in the more relaxed environment of in-class debating. However, I think that schools that are entering teams into debating competitions need to understand the full range an amount of resources that are needed to support the teams. Here are my first thoughts on what a school needs to plan for – can you add more?
- Each team will participate in at least three zone-level ’round robin’ debates. This means cover of some kind for at least three half days for each teacher taking a team.
- If a team wins their zone, they go on to play schools that are progressively further away. This usually means close to a full day of cover is needed for each debate beyond inter-zone finals.
- If my Year 11 team make it to the State Final they will have been in around nine debates. This means up to nine days away from most classes!
- Debaters need lots of coaching to do well. Weak debaters need coaching so they feel comfortable in the competition; strong debaters need coaching if you want them to go as far as possible in the comp. This could mean losing around one lunchtime per fortnight, or missing more classes – you will probably try to use your ‘free’ periods, meaning the kids will always be out of the same classes.
- Do they have clean shirts, ties, blazers etc.? Or will “someone” i.e. the coach have to organise this? The school may need to develop a system for borrowing formal uniform items.
- Debates have associated equipment – bell, stopwatch, palm cards, chairperson forms, glasses for water on the tables… You will need a designated storage space so these things are easy to find, especially in schools with more than one teacher coaching the teams.
I’m hoping to work out a real ‘budget’ – both for funding and staff support – for debating in my school. We’re always going to want more than we can have, but schools need to at least be realistic about what they are signing on for, I think.